Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just some thoughts on the current situation with Field.

1.  Why do we not have more maps like field?  Seriously   i .e: maps that players believe will build the server.    i.e. maps that players feel comfortable with in small population servers.

2. Why not put the snowy version of field in the rotation?      At least if we gonna bail to field when things get small... we can try it in a def skin.

3. Field teaches us that core of good game play is when all the players can see/ understand the battlefield.  i.e.  maps that are very big lose this aspect of game play.

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Fully agree with point 3. The best original renegade maps are simple as fuck just see under, field, walls, city, walls, island. Those are almost simmetrical and easy to undertand.

 

Where's city in ren-x? T-T

th-1657399286.jpg.3b355d06afa2b0cf297588701a7cc1c8.jpg

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • Totem Arts Staff
Posted

You already have Field X, we don't need more Field reskins. The point of having multiple maps is to have variation in gameplay, not adding duplicates.

One of these days you gotta get off the baby home turf and start fighting in the jungle for once.

  • Haha 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 8/25/2022 at 7:32 PM, RustyShackleford said:

First time I ever agreed with a mod.

 

Silo promotes stalemates & lengthens baselocks. Bring back the barn.

Everyone wants the barn.  The devs withhold it because they hate America.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...