isupreme

I am glad i looked at this information. I am even more happy to hear of the progress being made to enhance player privacy and data security. The plug in looks like something we need.

I got to think this is already known... but just in case.... Today on Walls, when i exited my light tank next to the "scaffolding" by the wall - i got exited into the interior of the scaffolding and I could not find a way out. Bummer. But ya almost got to expect that kind of thing to don't ya? o0

Can we build a Renegade X metaverse? Hehehehe... Ok i know we cant. well... unless we raise 50 billion in donations. But i will say it is fun to have the forums gamification in place. That is Def TOO much Fun. A metaverse.... where we could chillax while trying to hook into the server desired.... A metaverse... with Taverns, Target Ranges, and a Museum of RenX . Yeah!

I got to play on this map the other day. I find the layout interesting. The double bridge must make for some intense fighting... Seems like it will elevate the role of support to keep moving your team forward.. maybe... It would be fun to see it in action.

Yeah I find the " preferred" to be a step too far. -- - But i still feel there is some room for making some auto placed mines possible in small team matches......where often mining is neglected and the result is matches ending quickly and suddenly. Maybe asking for some maps to be equipped for very small teams and designated as such, is a step too far as well, but it doesn't feel like it. We increasingly have servers active with very small teams. Off hours, or when the ONE server is full... Increasing the fun in these situations could be a big boost to our player numbers overall.

Played around in the Testing today. Sweeeeeet. I really am curious how this will play because of the arrangement of the field and the asymmetrical bases. But I also love the general look of the map. Maybe its the effect of the Volcano and all the lava, maybe it is the ocean gently lapping (!) at the shore behind the base, or ... maybe its the way the landscape offers interesting places to fight.....

The map i would most like to see played with full teams and without Creative mode.....

1. Maps played today ie: how often each got used. 2. GDI wins / Nod wins !!! This would be awesome to see. 3. Each map win/loss for gdi/nod ? Ive seen some stats thrown around but... daily count would be fun. 4.Which maps get a successful revote? ie: which maps get voted in and then voted OUT. 5. It would tickle my Renx funny bone to see what vehicles and character got used and to what end. 6. How donations are going. 7. Player counts per day. 8. Ongoing average time of gameplay.

I kinda like the latter part of your suggestion - about players who join. Some credits to work with is especially helpful when you balance the teams by switching. I know for a while we tried allowing players to keep money when they switched, but I guess that ran into problems as it did not last long. Maybe providing a bit more credits to a player who balances would be kind, and the one harvester delivery is quite logical.

Hang in there... help may be on the way! ie: forums may be slow but are generally gonna help ya.

I NEVER knew that!! that double clicking works.... OMG. this game.....

yes it is confusing. Don't click that button. When you open. Click on a server. ( It should be highlighted) Then "select a server" will turn to JOIN NOW Click that. Glad you visited the forums... hope you enjoy the game. If you feel like returning to forums with your impressions of the game please do!

Wait I am not done with my 10 hours of giga puddin yet!

I remember when the discussions were about allowing the rep tool be purchased. At that time the idea i caught was: " Everyone wants to be able to help out" Perhaps the same argument could be made with this idea.

Could we set things up so a very small population server could start a map with some basic mines in place at the beginning? Was this ever discussed or tried? It seems like several good purposes could be achieved with this. Maybe the plan does not use All the Mines, but leaves some available? 1. Small population servers could make better/longer use of some maps where mines are essential - but don't always get placed by inexperienced players. 2. Inexperienced player can see solid basic mining practices - and maybe emulate them later... 3. Might allow the use of stronger bots without sacrificing the base.. .

Man! i love me some early vocal music. Gregorian or whatever it all rocks my boat. All i can offer in response is this modern adaptation of some Awesomeness by Sting. This concert hall has been made to invoke the Sistine Chapel.

I would prefer it if using Q on a player only made an audible request to the player, and not an audible request for the whole team. Sort of like a chat whisper instead of a team chat item. I am not sure what the purpose of informing the whole team could be?? I am glad the game has so many communications pathways but maybe we could do a little trimming and allow the critical material to surface out of the flood waters. #Reduce the Clutter!

Just curious. They usually happen on weekend....

L = Deny team or Deny to team

your name on the vehicle does not reflect the status of locked or unlocked. Only when you see "locked" after your name is it locked.

Yep. I'm in favor of placing Player Educational info in Poster form inside buildings. Why not put some of the information directly into the game ? GDI poster in Barracks reads: Engineer reps help, But Hotwire Reps Rule!! etc etc

Lol. Yes! Especially because all it takes is that ONE Mammy to mess it all up..... lol

Yes. or organized by rank....

Unite them with the sound of a thousand voices singing.....