R315r4z0r

Not only does the media platoon spread information across multiple forums quickly, but EA has mentioned Renegade X countless times in BCPT. Then there all the random viewers on the ModDB page. This mod is going to have a crap load of people playing when it's released.

R315r4z0r. Shocker, right?

So you want to find out the amount of people who are going to play the game when it's released? Well, I will. 2

In the most recent BCPT (came out a few days ago), in APOC's corner, he mentioned Renegade X again. But this time he spent a decent amount of time expressing how awesome it was. You can watch it here: http://portal.commandandconquer.com/portal...0006017780aRCRD

I've seen them before. Really funny. I like the Macgyver part.

QUOTE (DeathLink6.0 @ Sep 12 2009, 10:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What?

They would be a cool server-side option. Allowing players who die by Tiberium to turn into AI visceroids.

http://www.renegade-x.com/Forums/index.php?showtopic=2665

Would submitting the remake maps be allowed? Because technically they are Westwood/EA concepts, not yours.

I'm always server hoping. My new hangout is Exodus.

We've read that they are eventually planning on adding in new game modes such as capture the flag and world domination mode. But what else could they put in besides those? Post an idea you come up with in this thread to maybe help spark an idea for the devs. My idea: Game name: "Bounty" Bounty could be considered a "tactical death match." It's every man for himself (or it can be teams, but I think FFA would be more fun). Players are able to purchase vehicles and other classes, however you only gain income by killing other players. When you kill someone, you take all that they are worth, or their "bounty." Their "bounty" would appear above their head when you target them. (If you spend money on a character, your bounty is your current credits + how much the purchased unit costs.) The person with the highest bounty at the end of the match is the winner. The reason I called it a "tactical" death match is because it really isn't about getting the most kills. You might have the most kills, but your kills may not have been worth much money. If you only save your shots for the really expensive bounties, then you can win with the least kills.

First of all, stop demanding things. They aren't making this mod to please you. Also, in making this mod, they aren't doing anything to physically harm the original Renegade, so there is no need for the "If you're doing this, you better do it right" attitude. Second of all, Fobby already answered that question: QUOTE ((NE)Fobby(GEN) @ Aug 30 2009, 07:34 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I think it be cool if they thought up and calculated special 'marathon mode' maps. They would be larger than normal AOW maps, but have the same sort of choke point style that allows matches to run for hours. That way the game wouldn't become stale on a smaller map. It would have to be designed the perfect way to make it large and incorporate battle choke points but small enough for people not to get aggravated at long hikes/drives.

QUOTE (Mr. Weedy @ Sep 6 2009, 03:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> They are like skins, you can't put them in UT3. The game doesn't let you. Q: Are beacon pedestals going to be in the game?

QUOTE (klote2314 @ Sep 5 2009, 09:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I didn't say anything about building limits, refineries or economy... so what exactly are you replying to?

In my opinion, I don't think that's fair. (To the cheater or to the other players) If someone is caught cheating, they should be banned from where they were cheating and only where they were caught cheating. No where else. So if I was found cheating on one server, I shouldn't be banned from every other server unless I cheated there too.

There is a system in APB that lets you pick and chose which people in your APC to eject.

It's a little bit more bouncy than Renegade is. It moves fast but you can halt your controls instantly making the gameplay seem a bit jumpy. But at the end of the day it plays pretty well. They said they are going to be redoing the character animations somewhere down the line, so that might change.

I like the idea of victory conditions, but I don't like the suggested one. You're basically taking away a major key initiative from the game play. People will lose interest in the game if they simply have less buildings than the other team. Just because you're team has less buildings, doesn't mean they are necessarily bad or that they are losing. The team with less buildings at one point in the match can come back and win a match with points. Taking points out just takes away a lot of teamwork and makes the gameplay stale. Personally, I happen to enjoy marathon games that go on for hours upon hours. If someone can't fit it into their schedule, then that's their problem. It's only a game!

QUOTE (An4x1madr0s @ Aug 30 2009, 11:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, there was Red Tiberium, but it wasn't called Cruentus. Even though Cruentus translates to "bloody," Cruentus is actually the name for a large, highly combustible form of Blue Tiberium, which IS in the retail version of TS.

Off topic: Your signature is reeeeeeally long.

In UT3, they allow you to pick and chose a modified player variatent with player chosen additions to their character. It's not a skin, but a freely accessible feature applied to the characters in the game. (Like you can swap out your helmet style, your armor style, your shoulder armor style, ect). I think he is asking if something similar will be possible with Renegade X somewhere down the line, not if they can create custom textures/skins for the mod or not.

He also reminds me of the Scout from TF2 :V

QUOTE (AsgarothXc @ Aug 30 2009, 07:02 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That's from the st0rm-gaming community.[/b] They are going to be disappointed as they can't exactly create "skins" for Renegade X/UT3 I have a question about the PT/free units. Are the free infantry going to get their own characters sometime down the road or will they all just be the basic soldier with a different weapon?

Don't you think it's safer to have windows in which enemies can't see the driver through?