Make harvy control a separate Command

[isupreme]

Make harvester control a separate commander.

I.E.   allow players to vote in a harvester control player.   

In this scenario players could vote for a person to manage the harvester.   This would allow a less consequential vote.    Is it not intimidating to be voted commander?  Not everyone wants to be the Total Commander.    I would readily take harvy control in a game tho  i loath the commander role.

To some extent this is a continuation of the idea to create sub commanders.      I think it would be awesome if a commander could have players who manage key aspects of the battle to help the commander focus on a winning solution.  If Chat could show the sub commanders input and information...   

   A harvester commander would be an easy first step.

ofc the harvy command could be managed by any commander.

 

Edited January 24, 2019 by isupreme

[roweboat]

Basically, I like the idea of there being more than one person on a team that can use some of the commander powers. Encourages more than 1 attack at a time then.

There's a reason the "Squad" concept is so effective in battle.

[Fffreak9999]

17 hours ago, isupreme said:

To some extent this is a continuation of the idea to create sub commanders

Just enabling sub commanders would be easier.

They had near full functionality if I recall.

[isupreme]

Would it be difficult to achieve this?      

Like many of my suggestions i suppose it would be a low priority,   but hey sometimes low priorities get done!   (as in putting the map name on the map    )

[NodSaibot]

12 hours ago, isupreme said:

Would it be difficult to achieve this?      

Like many of my suggestions i suppose it would be a low priority,   but hey sometimes low priorities get done!   (as in putting the map name on the map    )

No, it’s not hard. Time to work on RenX is limited, sadly. And there aren’t many hands working on it.