Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I like the gun emplacements in Whiteout and so i thougt about it, in which map this things could be a usefull adition for the gameplay.

The only map in that a gun emplacemaent could work is island. So in my humble opinion a gun emplacement could be placed in top of the bunkers, thats guards the front entrance of the bases.

What do you think?

Posted

I'm not so sure if it NEEDS a gun emplacement. Islands is and always has been one of my favorite maps because it is a relatively balanced non-base defense maps.

I mean, it would be cool to add to the bunkers but I don't know what value it would add to the map dynamic.

Posted

On islands, it might stop those early hotwire/engi rushes coming in from the main entrance ... the unexpected route

This suggestion is just a lazy-mans solution to weak-teamwork-resulting-in-building-loss

Why not also on the top of the walls, or the sides of the walls, so we can prevent those anoying orca/heli-lifts that bring in those gnasty anoying hotties/techies in the sides? hmm?

I say nay to gunemplacements on maps that didnt have them originally

Posted
I'm not so sure if it NEEDS a gun emplacement. Islands is and always has been one of my favorite maps because it is a relatively balanced non-base defense maps.

I mean, it would be cool to add to the bunkers but I don't know what value it would add to the map dynamic.

I dont think it will chance the balance , because the emplacement will be added to both bases.

And with the upcoming balance chance (viewtopic.php?f=138&t=74115),

this small adition to island will just give the map a little bit more spice :) .

  • Totem Arts Staff
Posted

Neutral gun emplacements on random (strategic) places in the middle of the map. For upcoming new maps, might be worth a try

Or a tech structure that has them (something like Tech Outpost in RA2, I think)

Posted
Neutral gun emplacements on random (strategic) places in the middle of the map. For upcoming new maps, might be worth a try

Or a tech structure that has them (something like Tech Outpost in RA2, I think)

Yes, nice idea.

Why not also on the top of the walls, or the sides of the walls, so we can prevent those anoying orca/heli-lifts that bring in those gnasty anoying hotties/techies in the sides? hmm?

Well, i still prefer a manned rocket emplacement on walls, instead of adding automatic base defends.

So one rocket emplacement could be placed on the top of HoN. The other for GDI could be placed on the top of the Wf.

Another solution for balance issues would be to increased the respawn time of the emplacements up to 3 minutes or longer.

Posted

Why not also on the top of the walls, or the sides of the walls, so we can prevent those anoying orca/heli-lifts that bring in those gnasty anoying hotties/techies in the sides? hmm?

Well, i still prefer a manned rocket emplacement on walls, instead of adding automatic base defends.

So one rocket emplacement could be placed on the top of HoN. The other for GDI could be placed on the top of the Wf.

Another solution for balance issues would be to increased the respawn time of the emplacements up to 3 minutes or longer.

I was being sarcastic

Posted

Why not also on the top of the walls, or the sides of the walls, so we can prevent those anoying orca/heli-lifts that bring in those gnasty anoying hotties/techies in the sides? hmm?

Well, i still prefer a manned rocket emplacement on walls, instead of adding automatic base defends.

So one rocket emplacement could be placed on the top of HoN. The other for GDI could be placed on the top of the Wf.

Another solution for balance issues would be to increased the respawn time of the emplacements up to 3 minutes or longer.

I was being sarcastic

Sometimes in sarcasm could be found a good idea :D

  • Totem Arts Staff
Posted
Offense should be encouraged, not defense, IMO.

For once I agree with Gozzy. I definitely think we have enough overcompensation for defence with the addition of EMPs and AT mines.

Posted
Offense should be encouraged, not defense, IMO.

For once I agree with Gozzy. I definitely think we have enough overcompensation for defence with the addition of EMPs and AT mines.

But offense will rewarded by destroying the emplacement :cool: .

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...