TheGroundsKeeper

Yea i heard the devs talking about that, but a man can dream

I totally agree with this, when you fought like mad to get a siege to the enemy base, you deserve to hold the line there. Same for in base airstrikes, it is the lamest ever.

Just did alot of games on the jelly server, and the rubberbanding effect could still occur. did not feel like less than with the 64 cap. Just saying.

Lol i do that alot by mistake, and i have played since 2002!!! Lol

Hotwire'ing a hand of nod with 2-3 engineers trying to shoot me with their repair gun A sbh placing a nuke inside gdi base but oustide range of a building. Rocket trooper not going for refil even though he was camping at his own powerplant. A guy placing all mines in the field.

Well i asked it because the old renegade supported it, and i knew alot of people who found it awesome(Me included). I hope they get the last bits sorted out so the big games can become a reality again, in was yet another thing that made renegade stand out from the crowds

The problem with ingame voice chat is that people have absoluteley no clue on how to not broadcast their wierd sounds and rage attacks. I prefer just private teamspeak servers or skype anyday over having to listen to 5-10 players masturbating ingame, or thinking they are the super commanders of the renegade world.

Dont diss it before you try it, i loved the 127 player games in the old ren But if you dont like it ofc you can just join a smaller server, i totalllyrespect that That is the beauty of choice.!

The game is up and running and so far it has been a blast. Today you guys capped the games at 40players wich i feel has crippled the fun slightly. So.. How far are you guys from realizing the old 100+ player games?

Problems are really the player cap atm, this issue were non existent in the ond 120player games

If you like me are using lower volumes everywhere then the intro music is isnsaneley loud, and it does not seem to go down in volume when configure the sound in the options panel.

We tried it today me and a buddy i wanted to introduce to the game, we both clicked the same server but got thrown into different games. We had to use the open command and use ip to get in the same game. I think it is a server list bug of some sort.

Same issue, also sometime if you tab out. Windows 7 64x Core i7 4770k Z87 chipset 780 gtx

Aww, hope you guys fix it fast, i always felt the more the merrier in renegade

LOl i have it the other way around, where are the 128player servers?

The very first time they ever talked of Airstrikes during the closed beta, i said it was a bad idea, and i still think it is a gamebreaker. People spam them all the time and dying in the middle of your own base just gets old within a half a minute. Hovever i think there is a reasonable fix for it. Either make it a vote thing. 10 votes or somethiing for a sweep of a area. Everyone who votes yes looses x amount of credits, and uses a Airstrike point. (maybe like max 3 pr round total for each team). Or... Make it a Team effort. 3-5 players are needed to place the airstrike, they have to point the laser at the same location for a certain amount of time. And at the same time when deployed warn the other team of incomming airstrike. (big reticle on the ground or something.) After this those 3-4 players have used their airsrike ability for the rest of the match. Point is that it has to be limited or hard to do if it have the cabability for one person to ruin a well earned siege from the other team. It must not be able to be used for point farming and should be a strictly stalemate breaker only!

Also a problem with making this game "every other game" is that then you might aswell play "every other game". Then what is the point in making it? "Every other game" is already out there several times over. For me this is a remake for the people that thinks "every other game" is kinda crappy and want a new version of a over 10 year old game he still plays and think is better than "every other game" out there. "Every other game" will be forgotten in 6months, this one i hope will last for +10 years.

I totally agree with this, it is not supposed to be a lame grind game where you get awarded on how much you play not how you play.

Sounds like a interesting idea, though it might make "sidestepping"(driving to the side and shooting with tanks) uneffective wich would be a shame. But tbh, i am pretty neutral on the subject.

While i do not know anything about the net coding, I remember 127 player games O_o that is more than 99.9999% of all shooters nowaday, and back then ze interntz connections were like 100x smaller. I know the hosters of theese games probably had some badass servers and back bone connections, but 127 players in the same game is hardly "not many players" So unless you plan on 512player c&c mode(Drooool!)...

Hey dude, welcome to the forum.

This just made my day Gotta share it with you all http://retardo.dk/videos.php?id=3265

Hell yea! Best multiplayer Made! And soon it will be back even better!

Already shared it on Facebook. Almost shit my pants when i saw the awesomeness of the vid. It is gonna be a long 2013 waiting for this!

Looks awesome, cant wait!! Keep up the good work guys!