Atomsk

All fair with me. I felt the same as you and wanted to play FS so I joined up. It's not really a closed party as far as I know. Nevertheless, I love it and I look forward to playing it with everyone else.

You can sign up to become a tester. You'll see that the devs are announcing regular test-rounds. It's alive and well!

Who cares - devs have brought this game to life, have kept it running, others have shelled out money to run servers... I cannot imagine the total cost of working hours, infrastructure, licenses, freelance work that has been put into this game. Why should TA be transparant about where that money goes? Get some cocaine and hookers for all I care, I'd be happy to donate some of my money towards that. Developing a game, keeping it alive, after all these years and now that devs finally get the jackboot of EA off of their necks, people want transparency what is being done with donations.

With RenX having a few hundred (I think?) active players, it's unavoidable that seasoned players are grouped up. I hate seeing complaints that aren't clarified. If people find the other team stacked, what do they want then? Who needs to switch to balance things out? I'll just continue doing what I've been doing since I've seen people complain about unbalanced games: Ignore and it and play the damn game No issue with voice chat, btw I'm too old for it, so I'll just spam all your asses in chat

I would also be very interested in this, especially per map. I can't imagine how often I've bought a light tank in field, lost it, hopped back to base and got another one If this data was available in a raw database, I'd love to play around with it in Power BI or something.

It's a well thought out idea, but I'm not really for the idea of boosting cred production by repping the ref mct. When baselocked, I think there are plenty of available options that can be used to break free or to turn the game. Buffing out, getting the right mix of tanks, reps and emp or anti-tank-infantry (gunner/lcg/rockets if you need bang for buck), airstrikes, voting in commander, doing an infantry rush. For money (and VP), I go rep teammates or try to make a move on silo. The game is geared to getting a good group dynamic going. Implementing things that reward an afk-dynamic would make the game a bit dull to me.

Works great when trying to squirm into a full server

Just doubleclicking a server works too. Welcome, hope to see you in-game

Very nice. I like the idea of doing 16v16! I have often wanted to hear and see how some of you veterans play, in a smaller group. Will definitely try to join next week.

I don't mind mods reshuffling teams. If this were to be a vote mechanic though, it would kill the server. There's also all this other stuff to factor in, like vehicles and placed mines. There's also some credence to just play the cards you are dealt. Plenty of ways to pull a team together and turn the table. Happened in plenty of games. Honest question though: what makes a game stacked? Other than a group of people teaming up in vc on a public match, I wouldn't know. That sort of gives an unfair advantage.

Will application to become beta tester appear on forum? I think it was mentioned in the latest devtalk. I just need to know which channel I need to obsessively check

It sucks to hear that, I've happily spent many hours on your server. Thanks for that. I won't derail the thread any further, so see pm As for the voting options, the "stop-harvy-by-vote" discussion resurfaces Honestly, I'm happy with anything that is feasible. I would love to see those features as voting options. The only thing these ddos's have proven to me, is that we stick around . Despite lag and being a server nomad, people still show up. Having these voting options would fill more servers, I think. Lately, matches on small maps with low pop that don't get played often (and can be great) are ruined because no one wants to command to stop harvy, or people use ions/nukes.

[offtopic]Anyway the community can help further your cause? I don't mind donating a little bit. Perhaps others can too?[/offtopic] It depends on the max player limit for the server and the type of map/amount of buildings it seems like a good middle-ground to me Trying to play on a low-pop server and having someone use nuke or ion is the one thing that will get to me and make me rq on a bad day

Was online when it happened, wtfman kept changing usernames and added a space at the end to duplicate it. Did this with multiple people too and attempted votekicks. Spammed "watch where you're pointing that" all the time. I wish there was a playermute option

It kills low-pop servers when people ion/nuke. I'd prefer a 20 people limit.