Lyserg

I don't really see the problem with not being able to run dedicated servers. More intense games like OF2;DR run perfectly fine on client-created servers. what makes you think CoD:MW2 wont?

What they said. You're allowed to have/download a 'backup' copy if you own a legit key, therefor a legit game.

Wow... Immagine seeing someone tow that thing in at a LAN. I'd lol @ them for spending so much money on.. well.. Pretty much a useless project. but seeing the way the vid's made, and the way the project progressed, it seems they did it for the lulz only. Can't blame 'm, when I could've done that I would've.

QUOTE (Spycon @ Oct 22 2009, 11:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Aint that just caus of the no-dedicated server thing though? Other then that the game looks fine imo. Besides.. I've played more intense games online without dedicated servers(Operation flashpoint 2 for example), so I don't think it's really gonna be a problem.

QUOTE ((NE)Fobby(GEN) @ Oct 24 2009, 05:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Agreed, in the few matches I've played since the patch I noticed the MRLS and the Arty being pretty much equal in dps. It just comes down to who can aim the best.. If the guy in the MRLS sucks, he wont lock on many missles and probably miss a lot, if the player in the arty sucks.. Well.. He'll just bluntly miss. It's actually based on skill now more then it was before.

Mario eats mushrooms though, can relate beter to him caus of that. ;O but on the other hand.. Crowbars own..

QUOTE (FooFighter @ Oct 14 2009, 11:18 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Sadly, I aint on drugs at this time. therefore I 'soberly' dissagree it's overpowered, I've destroyed enough to be able to say so without getting even my med tank shot to hell, but it has also occured the other way around. Consluding it's quite well balanced. QUOTE (SIBTI @ Oct 14 2009, 12:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Impossible without buying a UE3 licence and the rights to the C&C franchise, or atleast Renegade. all in all it would either turn into total bankrupcy of the community(if donations would be accepted for that prupose) or lawsuits from 2 large game companies, Epic and EA.

QUOTE (FooFighter @ Oct 14 2009, 11:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Some time this month. It has been said numerous times already in various threads. I know there's annoying problems with the search engine, but please alteast check out some form of technical support or bug report threads before asking such questions.

Interesting. ;o Quite a good read.

QUOTE (FooFighter @ Oct 12 2009, 08:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Then people need to learn how to rush.

QUOTE (maty @ Oct 11 2009, 11:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That isn't a unit though! ;O

QUOTE (FooFighter @ Oct 11 2009, 06:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Then how come I've destroyed many arties in 1on1's in a med tank? Same the other way around. I've destroyed arties with MLRS' sometimes, but it was a little harder since I can't really predict the path the missles take, including the amount of time it takes for the missles to hit their target, most of the time. there's sucky arty drivers, as are there sucky med tank drivers, same goes for every vehicle in the mod.

It all comes down to whoever drives the vehicle though.

QUOTE (FooFighter @ Oct 11 2009, 05:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Hmm.. Hard to say. I'm guesing my fav would be techy/engy as a unit, flametank or MLRS as the fav vehicles.

QUOTE (BetaSword @ Oct 11 2009, 04:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Read the rest of this thread please.

QUOTE (=HT=Duro @ Oct 11 2009, 03:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> True, but don't forget the frontend isn't even in it's Beta stage, it's an Alpha. I know how frustrating it can be and I know mny people go play something else when it is, but there's more ways then one to connect to servers and it aint hard to find out how. QUOTE (KindredPhantom @ Oct 11 2009, 03:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No problem, have fun playing!

QUOTE (KindredPhantom @ Oct 11 2009, 02:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Exodus: 216.245.195.90:7777 BlackIntel.org: 87.253.133.61:7777 [=SC=] Stalker-Contact.de (Renegade-X Server) 85.214.120.43:7777 those 3 I know mostly have people on 'm to some extent.

QUOTE (oompah @ Oct 11 2009, 02:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You people should learn to look around the forum before posting things like this. It's been known to be down every now and then for a while now. If it's down just launch the mod and connect to server through the console, IP's can be found in the server IP's thread in Technical Support.

QUOTE (Qwerty @ Oct 11 2009, 05:32 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You might see a very slight difference between 60 and 120Hz screns, siomply because you can se around 80-90 frames. Any higher is a total waste. there's a site named 100fps.com with more info. I've also already said the human sight can't be compared in frames, but it is known that around 80-90 frames is about the limit, and 100 being the utter limit for anyone with trained sight. You're just repeating what everyone else has said in the thread.

QUOTE (bali @ Oct 10 2009, 11:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> dude, tl;dr And about the ATi(AMD) card thing you said in your previous post, that's pretty much bullshit. I've got a monitor capable of a 75Hz refresahrate, so my Vsync will try to limit my fps to 75. It's all based on the refreshrate setting.. Same goes for nVidia cards when vsync is enabled.. that's about the only thing I understood you wanted to say in your previous post.

QUOTE (leadpumper @ Oct 10 2009, 05:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ever heard of: 'If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.'?

QUOTE (bali @ Oct 10 2009, 03:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Please rephrase that.

QUOTE (bali @ Oct 10 2009, 12:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The only thing turning off vsync will do when you already have a totally smooth gameplay of 60fps or more, is tear the shown frames horixontally. Rofl. Besides, if your monitor's refrashrate it set to 60Hz you wont even see more then 60frames, even though it's saying you're pumping out 120.

QUOTE (Tunguska47 @ Oct 10 2009, 02:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The mod isn't even out yet, what are you talking about. Hell, if the bug was known before hand, the beta wouldn't have been released. It's due to some last minute changes made in the code right before release. this has already been said, and the bug has been reported a zillion times. Think of the dev's for a sec, think how they feel being badmouthed for days on end caus some of the players can't understand what a beta release is. They actually put their time into creating something for everyone to enjoy, with or without bugs. Above all,they do it for nothing at all. You people are acting like this is the end of the world. Grow the fuck up, and patiently wait for a patch. I guess after waiting for years for this mod to come out, the least you could do is wait another week or 2. /RANT

QUOTE (dsi1 @ Oct 10 2009, 03:02 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The same reason I fail to see why it should be raised. even if it's merely a few seconds work, it's still a few seconds work. It has no further use to enhance gameplay. If you really crave for those 100+ fps being shown, play instant action.. I really do fail to see the point in all this. I already know I can hit that fps, I don't have to be continuously reminded of it. I care more about the current game then whatever my fps is, as long as it's playable.