Neutron

I get your points, balance is important. Maybe it could work for a potential future Co-op gamemode, where players take role of the Campaign characters (From both GDI and Nod) and have to teamwork, survive against waves of hordes of AI' or accomplish Campaign style mission objectives? I just personally really wish that the old C&C Renegade singleplayer experience would be recreated in Renegade X. (And I think a cloaked Sakura with Laser gun as a Nod commando would be totally badass :P)

I understand, but Red alert APB did it, and it was really well made, thought it could work with Renegade X. Maybe it's just my nostalgia bias...

I don't know about you, but I find it weird to have a whole squad of Havoc clones running around with their 1 HK snipers, same goes for every other "Campaign" character like Ravechaw, Mendoza, you get the point. My suggestion are; 1. Replace "Dead eye" just with GDI sniper model that will have Dead eye's sniper rifle, you get the Idea, should be done with other "Campaign" characters. 2. Reintroduce the Campaign as Commando units, which are limited to only 1 Commando/Campaign character per team. Commandos are simply extra-ordinary in combat capabilities, but they are very expensive to purchase and there is a limit on them 1 per team. They carry 2 primary weapons aside of 1 secondary weapon, they are armed with multiple Remote C4 (To represent that they are commandos that are good at infiltrating buildings). Just gonna share the "Commando" unit idea: Havoc - Armed with the Default Assault rifle, but with Thermal ironsight or scope and deals twice more damage than the regular assault rifle. Armed with a Rocket Launcher aswell. you get the idea, there could be multiple Commando types for each faction. Sakura for example could have the Cloak ability.

Maybe give the Commander the option to drop/pay some VP points to charge the Obelisk/AGT when the power plant is destroyed? There could even be an auto-pay option where it would automatically pay X amount of VP points per minute to charge up Obelisk/AGT when the power plant is destroyed.

What the title says. The class and vehicle choice seem to be very limited and gets boring pretty quickly. Will we see new content such as New character class, new vehicles, perhaps new tools and upgrades (Like Nod getting immunity to tiberium for example?) And we will see bigger maps? Some maps seems to be way too small to be fair. Would love to see those bigger maps with RTS game mode where one players takes the role of the commander, where each team has only construction yard and the commander needs to setup a base. Perhaps we even can get Naval combat and Naval bases like in Red alert 3?

I hoped for something new, but I guess thats good too, maybe thats just small step into later on planning a new C&C title (I hope it to be Red Alert 4)

Since Ren X doesent follow the classic Ren game, would be awesome if instead of being limited to purchasing 6 characters with their specific equipment set, give us the options to purchase weapons, secondary, items and armor types separately from each other? That would give the players the possibility to create their own loadouts...

Did you guys heard in the last months that EA is planning for a new C&C game? What do you think the setting this new C&C game will have? Is it going to be a Red Alert game or it is going to be based on the Tiberium Universe? When they will announce it?

Can the Nod Rocket trooper be equiped with the Russian RPG-7 instead? Would be more fitting for the Nod faction... Might make it's projectile not lock on targets and travel slower, but deal more damage.

First off, I'd want to start off with the really annoying bugs/glitches that the game exhibit: 1. The AI bots seem to have this "Godmode cheat" where at random times they would instanteously regenerate all of their health+armor back for no reason at all in the middle of the fight. 2. The game sometimes just randomly closes off for no reason. 3. The vehicle physics sucks. And now moving on to the stuff that I think are just play unnecessary for the game and just overshadows what the Renegade classic was known for. 1. Why do we need recoil mechanics in this game? It's just completely useless feature. 2. Same goes for aiming downsights, It's unneeded and It's downright annoying that we are forced to use it for better aiming and accuracy. 3. I'm dissapointed with the fact that most of the lower tier guns just feel like airsoft/laser tag peashooters. Make them deal more damage and make them feel actualy more punchy. The Nod's stealth black hand laser gun was my favorite weapon because It's accurate and It's very punchy, here it feels like mediocre burstfire laser tag gun. 4. Why do we need that sprint feature? It's completely unnecessary, It's annoying that some just constantly sprint and make them a very hard target to hit. Either just remove it to respect the classic renegade formula gameplay, or just slow down the walk + sprint speed, so they wont be unnecessary fast. My point here is that Renegade X is trying too hard to copy battlefield, which is not the direction the game should go on in my opinion if you want to remake it. It should respect the classic roots and feel of the old classic Renegade game, where the movement feel is much more grounded, where It's all about knowning how to use the abilites and streights of character class you play instead of that recoil controling or aiming downsights garbage.

I've noticed this bug when playing with Ravechaw, It's main weapon - the Railgun I suppose, cant shoot. I click primary fire in my mouse, nothing happens, no any projectile coming from the rifle's barrel, and it doesent eat ammo away either.

ock, Metal, Industrial and Electronic Rock.

So funny how you fail to see it as irony, quit trolling. As I said, I dont need to do anything for you. I do not have to answer every of your questiong, you're not my school teacher, neither I'm your pupil. Get out. Stop with the denial, he IS being an arrogant, I'm not talking about others, I'm talking specificaly about him. If he is not arrogant, he wouldn't come with "xD dat looser gives up arguing lololol, answer all my questions noob lolz" he is acting like he is above me or something, while infact he is not. He we'rent providing any reasons as to why we should not fix the SBH ironsights. Yes, I admit being wrong with my suggestions, since you provided actualy counter-arguments, thats why I just asked for fixing the SBH ironsights, and this is where you went wrong. All what I see is "Nah nah. I dont want the SBH iron sights to be fixed. just dont use them." arguments, while I counter-argument those, they keep coming with the same thing all over again. I read it as "We're just too lazy to fix those, so stop teh complaining". It's an invalid argument as to why the SBH ironsights should not be fixed, come up with a proper and fair argument as to why the SBH ironsights should NOT be fixed, then I will aknowledge of me being wrong, if the argument makes a sense ofcourse, and not another of those stupid excuses which counts as being lazy. Also, I did not start any tantrum, thats what you and your friends started when they started to contempting instead of coming with fair and proper arguments. That basicaly tells that the SBH ironsights have no use in the game, all what I ask is for fixing them, so they can be used properly just like the rest of the ironsights on other guns, It's not rocket science that you all are thinking it is. We werent talking about the other iron sights. We're talking specificaly about the SBH ironsights. Also, I aknowledged that BF SW is not the best solution, so thats why I all what I just ask for is to fix the SBH ironsights, thats all. It's not rocket science. I do see issues with my suggestions, I aknowledge them, when you actualy gave them critism, now all what you do is contempt. Oh hello! Nice to see someone mentioning me. Welcome to the party.

Yea? Make me a video how "Good" you hit with them. Because even on static targets I have difficulties to hit them, because you know weapons have recoil aswell, so you have to abjust your aiming due to recoil, which is hard due to bad ironsights. And I've never seen anyone being good with those ironsights. I've called you stubborn because infact you fail to see the issues with the SBH ironsights, and just came here for the sake of arguing. The developers should focus on balancing and fixing the issues in the game, iron sights are not a differenct case. It's either now, or never. It's a reason why the game is still beta, to you know, to fix the issues, the ironsights is one of them. What, I'm some sort of slave or something, I'm FORCED to respond to every question you have to write? who you think you're are? You dont have to be complete [Censored] about that. I dont have to reply to every of your question just for the sake of satysfying you so you can enjoy arguing. If I dont answer some of your questions, that means I aknowledge of being wrong, and you know, I dont have to write "Yes, I'm so so so wrong xDD" to almost every question you write like a parrot. Whats wrong with giving up on arguing? What, cant find any other ways to boost your ego or something? Atleast I'm not stubborn and I aknowledge on being wrong, unlike you. Boy, you're really arrogant.

You're just being stubborn about this. Because I've never managed to land any good hits with those ironsights. ANd if you say that the SBH rifle is hitscan and you can get closer to your enemy and deal against him without ironsight... Then why not remove them completely? They're absolutly useless! I cant hit sh*t with those ironsights, the view from those ironsight is so much narrow that It's Impossible to see anything through them. As I said, either fix those ironsights, or remove them. And stop acting stubborn without seeing and understanding what I complain about just for the sake of arguing, cause It's very annoying. Stop acting like you can do good hits with those useless ironsights, cause I'm pretty sure you cant hit sh*t with them. Suuuure. I should go ahead and bump dead threads, which I'm pretty sure It's against the forum rules. Like I said before, stop acting subborn for the sake of arguing, It's very annoying.