capitalistpigdog
-
Posts
19 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Downloads
Forums
Events
Gallery
Posts posted by capitalistpigdog
-
-
Yeah. That's because you have to spend more money to get better weapons. That's just how Renegade works. Not all weapons are equal. This is something that is integral to the game and will not change.
Some of the maps I didn't recognize from Renegade. One was a big forest looking map. It was not fun to play on, lol.Afraid of change much? You can't possibly have an opinion on that map already.
Listen to yourself. "This thing can change but the other one cannot because I say so"
-
For those who dislike the Boink, what kill sound would be a possible alternative selection (as in option to change)?
None. Do you need a sound to know you killed someone? Stay plebeian forever.
-
Either they stay to play long enough to actually get it, or they leave back to their uncreative simplistic modern fps game.
I went back to DCS World. Sorry for liking what's popular
-
you can defend yourself when you're attacked (unlike other games where you can get killed by 2 shots in the back)
"I cannot handle being ambushed"
-
It pains me to see SO MANY suggestions for this. I outright contest every one of those. Good ideas are ones that don't drag this game into a direction of one that already exists. If you are going to make a battlefield clone, why not play battlefield? If you are playing this instead of battlefield, something about battlefield must be getting boring.
Almost stopped reading here. It is impossible to ask people to make an independent evaluation, unless they are completely new to gaming. Many people are only asking for things they have seen work in other games; this does not become a bad thing solely because these features are found in other games. Neither should tradition trump potential improvements.
On most other points you made I do not disagree.
Generally, grade weapons for their cost/character-cost, their intended purpose, and whether based on that they perform well, too well, or not well enough, as well as if they accomplish their intended purpose or not, and what people do use them for if not for what it's designed.
This way of assessment I do somewhat disagree with, because by that reasoning you could make the argument that the free classes are supposed to suck because they're cheap.
-
Well, yes, however this guy played the game for max 2 days and is more or less saying the whole core gameplay "sucks", its to be expected that this would fuel some flames...
Why would you care if the dev doesn't?
You're very informative, and it's leading me to become a better person.
I know I'm good.
-
I'm not even sure what you're trying to imply
At least put some effort into posting.
-
Especially since Renegade was made in 2002 and came before these big named games got so popular...
Yes, wow, a few months before 1942 and ~1.5 years before CoD. Is this some kind of hipster thing?
-
hey you know what? go back to cod/bf
Mongoloid intelligence on display, ladies and gentlemen.
-
I registered just to express my hatred towards OP and to tell him to get the fug back to whatever FPS he came from, which is probably Battlefield past 2.
>WAHHH GAME IS NOT TACTICOOL ENOUGH FOR MATURE GAMER SUCH AS MYSELF
Please die.
I registered to tell wastes of oxygen like you to fuck off.
Good god, "CoD this BF that" is not going to become a valid argument by you mongoloids saying it over and over again. Listen to this dev guy, he sounds reasonable.
-
I disagree with just saying "it sucks because it's free, deal with it". It isn't the right approach.
Every unit should be viable. The free units are viable when you want to go on a suicide mission but not waste any credits and the soldier is useless.
From what little I've played, I have to agree. Nod has tons of different infantry types but there has to be a reason you tend to see disproportionate numbers of Raveshaws.
-
As I've said. The only thing that actually has this "fast-paced"- gameplayfeeling feeling to it is infantry. And it may be possible that it may get slowed down (a bit). Remember, it's just an open Beta. Even the first version.
Well, so do the vehicles, but it's really no worse than Planetside 2 and I'm not exactly expecting another ARMA.
I do hope it gets slowed down and some of the weapons buffed just to make them feel less 'floaty'.
-
It may feel arcardey, but that's actually kind of a balance thingie..
Is there, then, inherent value in balance?
In this case it is. I may provide an example if you've ever played Renegade and one of it's mods. IF there's just ONE really overpowered unit (as the Havoc/Sakura may have been called in vanilla Ren) it kills the fun. And that's not the case in RenX in my opinion.
I'm afraid I haven't. I think right now the infantry in Ren:X kind of blurs together (everything feels UP) and the game really could do with a slightly slower pace. That's all I can think of for now.
-
It may feel arcardey, but that's actually kind of a balance thingie..
Is there, then, inherent value in balance?
-
We all have different tastes, no need to cause a fkin flame war because of it.
You started the Flame war when you gave the post this title: Impressions from a new player and why I think the game sucks
No, it was everyone else being overly defensive morons. The OP was pretty polite even if frustrated. I have little problem with the wall of text above, since it didn't devolve into "LOL COD; BF"
-
I don't understand your hostility at all. Don't like the game? Leave the forum and quit playing.
It is OK to be hostile towards people who disagree. This was amply demonstrated by those who responded to the OP.
Why are you so butthurt? Leave the foooorum boohoooo
When you remake a game from 2002 it's only a matter of time before people come on who never played the original and complain it's not like Battlefield or CoD. It shows the sad state of affairs when these two games dictate how an FPS should play to an entire generation of gamers.Battlefield's from 2002 as well, numbskull. You can't weasel your way out of this by using popular soundbites.
-
This thread is priceless. This guy is obviously, like others have said, a spoiled brat gamer who doesn't belong here. We welcome you to return to COD.
Nice ad hominem, clown. Are you trying to revive the community or kill it? Obviously the only community you want consists of people who are afraid of change.
-
Sadly the modern generation of shooters like COD and Battlefield raised a generation of gamers who cant shoot for shit,and think camping a corner is "tactical" which is a huge pile of crap to be honest.
What is ambushing, you dolt? Fair fights are for shitters. "Boohoo COD and BF" is not an argument, either. False premise.
The reason why a "simple" arena shooter like quake takes MUCH more tactical awereness than anything COD/BF or even ARMA has to offer,is EXACTLY because the firefights doesnt end in 0.002 seconds"I am rubbish at ARMA and keep dying, best stick to calling others bad"
And btw I am saying this as someone who has very vast experience on games like bf and played them on highest competitive ESL level"I am too fat to do actual sports and need to act like e-sports matter"
I wanted to like the game 'cause I used to like the C&C series, but it's painfully obvious that this one's only for grognards who cannot stop nostalgia-tripping. Improvements are banned, I guess. Enjoy your Stone Age.
New Players, Please Grade This Game Independently!
in Renegade X
Posted
Laughable analogy. We are talking about guns, presumably lethal ones. Besides, the GDI still gets grenadiers for free, so your argument topples over immediately.