[UI Scale]

I have a similar issue with UI scaling, though mine is less sever in some cases. I have an Ultrawide monitor and this is the game that has the biggest issues with UI scaling (that's not a bethesda game, anyway). Here are some examples, though I don't expect you to re-render cutscenes.

[My Feedback]

Hello,

I'll make this short and sweet, I feel that the changes made in Renegade X from Beta 3 onwards to Beta 5 have been a disaster.Completely disagree.

- Mesa II has been ruined.

This is extremely helpful feedback: you stated you had an issue but you have no reason why.

- Refineries still generate money even when destroyed.

It's supposed to be a trickle from what I've read, this makes it not impossible for a team to defend/make a comeback

- Vehicles can still be purchased even when airstrip/war factory is destroyed.

Ditto

- Suicide/nuke crates should be taken out, crates should only reward players - either with attribute upgrades or vehicles.

I disagree, it's part of the fun. In the original CNC and Renegade there were crates that had negative effects

- Only engineers should receive remote C4, not high tier characters.

Well, considering technicians and hotwires are highly trained engineers with advanced tools, this isn't a problem. If you're talking about the high tier snipers having it, I do kinda mind it, but it's not like they SBH's

- Buying multiple weapons/items shouldn't replace the current slots.

No comment, although this could cause extreme balancing issues where someone becomes a super-solidier

- There are many more issues/bugs which concern me but don't have the time to write a full list.

Again, helpful feedback

I know these are intended to balance gameplay but I feel this was not the right way of doing so.

better than not trying at all.

Regards,

You.

[Hover MRLS and Tesla Tank]

What about importing from blender? That's what I work with most of the time since I can't afford 3ds MAX.

[Multiplayer gaming is dead? What is there to play?]

Yeah .... why not look into all of that instead of boasting "Windows is good! Windows is great!" The Linux I run has yet to have any malware, and I get no crashes, unlike Windows. Bugs and issues are fixed ludicrously faster than on Windows. Overall, Windows can be thought of as crippleware. It's not about bragging, it's about understanding what's going on. Stop forming baseless opinions and "dive right in" to get the real facts about Windows and Linux. Windows is a sadistic company that tries to buy out and/or destroy competitors (glance at TechRights site if you're interested). Linux users have to make their own games a lot of the time thanks to those money-hungry companies and everyone else completely ignoring Linux thanks to baseless opinions like yours.

While gaming may not be on Linux yet, a lot of professional software devs are making more and more linux-compatible software making it more viable in the workplace (the place where it actually counts). I have a lot of family working for various software and networking companies and the shift is slow but steady. As far as windows goes itself, I enjoy it. It's easy, user-friendly and doesn't require much thought to actually get running. I'm also well aware of what can happen if I'm not careful with my browsing. However, I have a failsafe that I built myself to reset my computer. Linux, however, takes a bit more configuration and getting used to. A lot (a vast majority) of people don't have the time or patience to mess around with linux. As far as business goes, by your logic, all businesses are sadistic. One goes into business with the intention of making money so being "money-hungry" is a given. However, in terms of microsoft's case, a lot of that money goes into actual research and development (either directly -i.e. making new code- or indirectly -i.e. sending kids to school-). You also have to remember that windows is product to be sold because it puts food on people's tables (from the most basic to most extravagant tables). Linux, however is free. It doesn't cost a dime. Like it or not, friend, windows helps people. Why don't you find some credible sources instead of using websites like TechRights. I've found multiple credible websites that deny TechRights as a credible read. My advice: Learn to browse the web. Make sure you research what you're downloading and pay careful attention to advertisements and adware downloads. Get a new computer, as it's likely that whatever was in the depths of your computer is still there, if it was actually there. If it was just a pop-up that was telling you that files were infected and that you should buy such and such anti-virus, that program is the virus and just requires a bit of lag-inducing to get around it.

My final statement is to stop calling other opinions baseless, when the only source you produced wasn't completely credible yourself.

Just for the record, LOF, all computers will degrade. Obsolescence is a real thing as well.

[Multiplayer gaming is dead? What is there to play?]

Personally I enjoy Planetside 2 and I feel it has a very good F2P model and even an interesting backstory. My problem is it's performance and balance issues. Regardless, I'm not here to debate, I'm here to provide a suggestion.

Look up Arma 3. It's a game that you can play however you want. Period. It is the true definition of a sandbox. You want to play as a civilian in a police state? go ahead. You want to be in a platoon, fighting an enemy that's of equal or lesser technological strength? You can. You want to be an insurgent or a spec-op? Drive tanks? Be a dedicated gunner on a gunship? Do it. you can do just about anything in Arma 3. It has a larger player base and a lot of communities dedicated to different things. You can even create your own missions with ease. You can play with or against players and AI. It's really a lot of fun. No microtransactions, no fees for features. Hell, the Helicopters DLC that's slated for release soon won't keep you from riding in one of the new helo's (although it will in order to pilot it). It's by far one of the best games I've ever played. It's big, immersive and even though it doesn't have tracers everywhere, the combat is really intense because dying is really easy. It's not really an FPS as it is a combat sim. If it's not what you're looking for, then you can make into what you're looking for. You can mod it to hell and back again if you so desire.

My only complaint about it is that the AI only runs on a single core, so your FPS might take a hit in single player, but other than that it's a really solid game and has a much more intense and real multiplayer aspect than anything else I've seen so far.

Edit: I forgot to mention that it's $60 bucks on steam. And there's a new fatigue system that takes some getting used to, but once you do it's so easy to keep under control.