Jump to content

RadicalEdward2

Members
  • Posts

    98
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RadicalEdward2

  1. This has been bugging me for a while now so I thought it was finally time I made a post about this. In Renegade X, the Artillery doesn't shoot in a straight line like it did in the original game but, arcs instead. Personally, I think it would be more practical for the Artillery to use the nade launcher crosshair since that has tic marks for ranged shots. Could make for a small QoL update 🙂
  2. I know this might be a dumb question but, how do I uninstall the old Renegade X and its launcher? Do I just uninstall the launcher through "Programs and Features" or is there an actual uninstall exe? Or do I just ctrl+A and delete the files? 😅
  3. I actually still have that disc ♥
  4. I assumed it would be locked forward or maybe have a slight cone if it was useable so secondary gunners could use it (except the old optional gunner player feature was never added). But I guess that could work. not sure if you get what I mean but I'm referring to having the MG barrel functioning like the secondary MG on Panzers (except on turret and not on the chassis)
  5. I'm onboard with giving the tick-tank a secondary MG fire. It did have that barrel for an MG on it next to the main cannon.
  6. Newer promo videos and encouraging of more user created content could help boost server populations.
  7. Aside from the supposedly remake of C&C1, I'm not optimistic about anything EA has to tease.
  8. Personally, I would love to get some buildings with more interiors like from single player. Maybe giving refineries that whole lower level with the furnaces and random machine parts or the Airstrips with more fleshed out control towers with the elevators/ladders and consoles in the control room.
  9. I guess...but that's why I'm offering suggestions on how to improve the game 😅 Sure there's no need for new art at the moment but, there's definitely stuff that's still missing in the Tiberium department that could improve the game and make it more like the original Renegade. I mean, there's always room for more/improvement.
  10. Is it on the facebook page too? Also, do you guys have a moddb to post it to? Heck, even a video would probably get the attention of some new talent to join the team 🙂
  11. ah. I don't know how to make models either but, is there even a post up about looking for modelers?
  12. I'm all for having choices but, Field is played so often and voted for so often that it almost seems like the illusion of choice. As for mutators, I don't have the slightest idea how any of that stuff works. The probability of players turning into viceroids could probably use a similar RNG to the one used for making crates into nuke crates.
  13. I just wanted to give some of my feedback on how to fix the game and give it some much needed freshness. First things first, the level ups were cool but, I feel like they're a thing that kind of just come with the C&C territory. I'm not saying they're bad but the game needs more substantial changes to bring new life to the game (aside from new maps but that's another topic for another day). These are just some suggestions I have: 1. Finally follow through with getting Viceroids into the game. So far, I think I've asked about Viceroids like 3 times over the course of half a decade lol (once back in 2014, again this past February, and again now). Granted it wouldn't be a playable character/unit but, it would add something actually new to gameplay and actually make Tiberium fields more involved outside of being a cash field/no-go zone. To be honest, the lack of RNG for infantry to turn into Viceroids makes flamethrowers and chem troopers nothing more than glorified Flamethrower units with nothing else beyond a difference in stats to distinguish them. Or the fact that chem troopers are so indistinguishable from flamethrowers that they're just recolors of the laser chaingunners. I know Viceroids aren't a major part of the game but they ARE a major factor behind why Tiberium is dangerous after all. Also, its worth noting that Chem.Troopers would have something they can't destroy (at least not effectively). Maybe flamethrowers could even be more effective at eliminating them. The risk that Chem.Troopers and sprinting through Tiberium fields could spawn Viceroids (that CAN heal in Tiberium) would definitely added some much needed change to the game. 2. Offline Obelisks and AGTs could be reactivated (with a compromise) by having 2 or 3 Engineers charge the CMT. I mentioned this idea ages ago but, when Power Plants are destroyed, the advanced base defense structure just becomes useless and yet, we're still allowed to repair them. Like offline Tesla Coils in Red Alert 2, having multiple Engineers 'charging' powerless towers should reactivate them but, with a catch that could act as a double-edged sword. While a team COULD reactivate their tower without their power plant, it would require 2-3 Engineers to keep the tower online. On top of that, the towers would work at a far less efficient capacity when compared to a fully powered one. For example: An Obelisk of Light would take twice as long to charge before it can zap a target while the AGT has a slower reaction speed when it comes to targeting enemy units before it opens fire on them. In a way, this would give the crippled team a means of defending their base at the cost of having 2 or 3 less available players to aid on the actual battlefield (beyond defense); potentially doubling as a game changer for hours-long Field and Mesa matches. 3. Add 3rd person over-the-shoulder aiming Ever since I first played the game, I was always bothered that aiming while playing in 3rd person switched the view back to 1st person iron sights. If a dedicated Battlefront style over the shoulder aiming was added in-place of the switching to 1st person aiming, it would make playing in 3rd person feel more like a different style of gameplay and not a tacked-on feature that doubles as a means of peaking around corners (don't hide it, we all know that's all 3rd person is currently good for). Vehicles sort of already have this 'over the shoulder' zoomed in aiming; now its just a matter of ensuring that infantry have it too. 4. REPLACE THE ARTILLERY'S CROSSHAIR WITH THE GRENADIER'S CROSSHAIR The artillery doesn't fire in a straight line like it used to in the original game; it arcs its shots. The artillery NEEDS the rangefinding crosshair that the grenadier's use in order to properly make their shots because unless the target is within spitting distance of it, that crosshair isn't worth beans when it comes to being useful. 5. Increase the basic infantry pistol range Using the screenshot above as a frame of reference, the pistol CANNOT reach targets from this distance. Heck, I don't think they can his a player standing on the opposite end of a Nod airstrip. I get the nerf in the range was probably for ""realism"" but, using Canyon for reference, the pistol can't even hit someone on the perch that overlooks the Silo (they sort of can but, you HAVE to be standing on the silo to actually hit them). I know pistols don't have quite the same range as rifles but, they should at least be able to fire further than a store-bought Nerf gun. 6. Reinstate passenger control of vehicle turrets (when the vehicle is unlocked but the driver is present) Every vehicle in the game has at least one passenger seat because the original game had a designated gunner seat if a passenger was present. I know not a lot of people want to hand over gun controls to their passengers but, the vehicle queue is almost always full in-game. If gunner position was bound together with the "Lock Vehicle" key, maybe there will actually be more players sharing vehicles instead of waiting in queue for their turn to use a vehicle. On top of that, I feel like the APCs and Jeeps/Buggies are some vehicles that would definitely have benefits of having another player control the gun while the driver...drives. Granted, this feature isn't for everyone but, I don't see any reason why this teamwork-encouraging mechanic shouldn't be reinstated into the game. 7. Players should be able to give bots orders. Online and Offline, bots just kind of do whatever they want. At some point, maybe squad commands could be worked into the game so bots will actually follow orders when the player uses taunts like "Get In The Vehicle", "Get Out of the Vehicle", "Follow Me", etc. Anything that makes the bots look and feel more coordinated would be welcomed if it also benefits gameplay. 8. Better Vetted Map Rotations No matter which server I play on, whenever Field or Walls is picked, the game is pretty much goes one of two ways, one team gets steamrolled OR the match lasts 2-8 hours. I honestly think that some sort of cooldown should be added to the game so that other maps can actually be played. Maybe a 6-12 hour cooldown before a map can reappear in the rotation after its been played. Almost every time I log on to play, the most active servers are playing Field and I can even check back in hours later and see that the same match or one almost indistinguishable from the previous one on the same map is taking place. There's dozens of maps in this game that are more interesting than Field but, we keep ending up with Field being the only map ever being played. I can honestly say that I've unwillingly played more hours (days) on Field than I have on any other map in the game since I first started playing Renegade X. I would be surprised if the frequency of Field being played didn't play a part in hurting the number of people playing the game. I mean...I've had month long periods away from the game that I revisit it only to see that people are STILL playing Field instead of literally any other map in the game. I honestly can't remember the last time I've seen maps like Complex, Whiteout, Under, Volcano, or Outpost in the rotation. There's probably plenty of other maps that I'm missing but, Field is played so often that I can't even remember the names of the other maps. These are just some bits of feedback I have for the game. I hope they help improve the game in some way for the better.
  14. I always download the updates even though I don't play the game that often. Renegade X is one of those games I know I can always go back to (despite the sporadic schedule of when people are actually online). Me trying to make a map while simultaneously watching the walkthroughs on how to do so has definitely played a big part behind why I haven't been online as much as I would like to.
  15. yeah like missiles lol
  16. Why not make a mod that replaces the airstrike with gunboat barrages? (:
  17. it shouldn't be though. the game needs more traffic for it to grow. the bigger the community, the more potential there is for feedback and community-created maps and stuff 😄
  18. Spy would be a useless class because the disguise ability is already an established feature in Renegade. If there was going to be a new character/unit, I would say that it should have something to do with Tiberium. Better yet, instead of a new character, I would say Visceroids would be a nice addition (or in the case of RenX a re-addition since they didn't carry over from the original Renegade yet). Granted it wouldn't be a playable character/unit but, its would add something actually new to gameplay and actually make Tiberium fields more involved outside of being a cash field/no-go zone. It IS a major factor behind why Tiberium is dangerous after all. Also, its worth noting that Chem.Troopers would have something they can't destroy (at least not effectively). Maybe flamethrowers could even be more effective at eliminating them.
  19. Speaking of balancing, I would say that Nod artillery needs a proper crosshair since they can't actually shoot straight. Ideally, they should use the ranged crosshair that the grenadiers have so they can actually arc their shots properly. I remember bringing this up ages ago but, I don't know if anything was ever done to make this a thing. Aside from that though, I think most of the aspects of the game are pretty balanced.
  20. That sucks. At least there's some comfort that can be found in knowing that the active maintenance of this fan-game is keeping a portion of the C&C community.
  21. Didn't read much of the topic and just saw it in my feed so I wanted to give some quick feedback. Changing the games name and theme would literally kill the game. Its main appeal (at the end of the day) is the Command & Conquer feel that comes with it. Also, alternatively, having a paypal or patreon for donations could work since its optional and not actually going to the game itself. Just have it on dev profiles for donations maybe.
  22. they re-added it? I haven't been on in a while. Last time I played it was just the silo in its place.
  23. Kind of wished I had the chance to play the version of Field with the barn.
  24. Ensuring that the physics and skidding distance works is key On top of that, it needs to explode on contact if it hits an enemy target. Part Bouncing Betty, part Brute Shot grenade (Halo 2), and part light disc (TRON).
×
×
  • Create New...