Scrin101

Physical discs are so much better so its not backward at all. Its called getting what you paid for. Steam is shocking as it is chances of corrupt data is pretty high when downloading 5 gigs worth of files. Having a disc is a direct clone of information on your hard drive from the disc. Of course as well less time consuming. The only advantage having steam is cut prices on games but I would pay extra for the disc. Shame if you corrupted your hard drive though.

PC gaming does now have its limitations because of steam no such thing as a physical CD anymore which means even more downloading!!! Westwood may be gone but EA did a pretty good job at continuing its franchise. Westwood made the biggest change from strategy to fps,unfortunately to EA it just was not enough. Glad that Totem arts reformed a great game from the ashes though.

Noooo not steam there is probably another topic for renegade x to migrate to steam but its a bad idea. Firstly command and conquer is a single player series and relies heavily on its campaigns and skirmish modes. EA capped Westwood(developers of Renegade 2002) in the first place for failing to reach expectations. Secondly I think the player should have a choice either to play offline or multiplayer steam pretty much relies on its players to play online anyway.The game itself is gold quality and deserves to go further than PC.

Ahh I see considering its a free to play there wont be any point in paying extra publishing fees. Thought it might turn into an xbox phenomenon since its a classic FPS one off from its series. Im thanking the developers that they have not destroyed this game by putting it on steam. Or at least not as far as Im aware of.

Command and conquer as franchise has mostly been a PC series. Looking at CNC3 and red alert being introduced to Xbox I thought there may be a small chance that Renegade X might go multi-platform. Any thoughts???